Sorting object key-value pairs by the value is a common task in JavaScript development. Mastering different methods to sort objects sets you up to better organize, process, and display data.

In this comprehensive 2600+ word guide, we‘ll compare several methods to sort JavaScript objects by value using efficient native methods:

We‘ll look at a diverse set of examples, from basic to more advanced techniques, to give you lots of options to implement object sorting in your own applications.

Why Sort JavaScript Object Values?

Here are some of the most common reasons for sorting JavaScript objects by value:

Display Sorted Data in UIs

Sorting objects allows displaying key-value data in sorted order within UI components:

const data = {
  age: 32,
  name: ‘Lee‘,
  gender: ‘male‘ 
};

// Display in value sorted order:
// name: Lee
// age: 32  
// gender: male

This keeps displays predictable, uniform, and logically organized for users.

Easier Processing of Sorted Data

Analyzing sorted object data is much easier than unsorted data:

const averages = sortedData.map(item => item.value)
  .reduce((acc, curr) => acc + curr, 0) / sortedData.length;

Mapping, filtering, reducing, and looping over a sorted dataset allows building logic that relies on order.

Uniformsort Data from External Sources

Sorting normalizes objects from 3rd party APIs and databases into expected order:

const data = fetchExternalData(); 

// Sort guarantees order consistency  
const viewModel = data.sort((a, b) => a.value - b.value);

This handles varying external data in a uniform way.

Prepare Data for Other Operations

Many algorithms require input data to be uniformly sorted first, so sorting objects facilitates further processing and analysis.

Logical Organization

Sorting arranges data logically from smallest to largest or alphabetically based on language rules. This greatly improves scannability and comprehension for both developers and users consuming application data.

These are some common reasons why sorting JavaScript objects by values is an important operation.

Method 1: Object.entries() and Array.sort()

The Object.entries() method returns an array of key/value pairs for an object‘s properties. Coupled with Array.sort(), this provides an easy way to sort those pairs by values.

Basic Example

Given an unsorted object:

const data = {  
  age: 32,
  name: ‘Lee‘,
  gender: ‘male‘
};

We can sort the key/value pairs by value using:

// Get entries as [key, value] pairs
const entries = Object.entries(data);

// Sort by age value
entries.sort((a, b) => a[1] - b[1]);

console.log(entries);

// [
//   ["age", 32],  
//   ["gender", "male"],
//   ["name", "Lee"]  
// ]

Breaking this down:

  1. Object.entries() gives us an array representation of the object‘s [key, value] pairs
  2. Array.sort() sorts that array inplace, comparing values a[1] and b[1]
  3. The sorted array contains our entries in order

We can convert back to an object using Object.fromEntries():

const sortedObject = Object.fromEntries(entries);

This gives us a clean way to sort any object by its values.

Real-World Example: Sorting Blog Data

For example, to display blog data sorted by view count:

const blogData = [
  {
    title: ‘JS Arrays‘,
    views: 50    
  },
  {
    title: ‘Looping in JS‘,
    views: 100
  },
  {
    title: ‘Objects in Detail‘, 
    views: 75
  }
];

// Sort by view count
const sortedData = blogData.map(data => [
  data.title, data.views  
]).sort((a, b) => a[1] - b[1]);

// Display sorted titles:
// "JS Arrays"
// "Objects in Detail" 
// "Looping in JS"

This sorts the data properly for displaying posts by popularity.

Object.fromEntries()

The Object.fromEntries() method introduced in ES2019 gives us another concise way to sort objects by value.

We can combine it directly with Object.entries() and Array.sort() without requiring additional conversion:

const sorted = Object.fromEntries(
  Object.entries(data).sort((a, b) => a[1] - b[1])  
);

By calling fromEntries() on the sorted array, we get the sorted object output immediately in one statement.

Browser Support

Object.fromEntries() has excellent browser support, but lacks IE support:

Object.fromEntries() Browser Support

Source: CanIUse.com

So just be aware of this when using fromEntries() in production apps required to support legacy IE browsers.

Array.reduce()

The Array.reduce() method gives us another approach to sort an object by value as we build up the sorted output:

const sorted = Object.entries(data)
  .sort((a, b) => a[1] - b[1])
  .reduce((acc, [key, value]) => {
    acc[key] = value;
    return acc;
  }, {});

Breaking this down:

  1. Get entries with Object.entries()
  2. Sort entries array by values
  3. Use reduce() to build sorted object
  4. Return accumulated object each iteration

Reducing over the sorted entries allows constructing the target sorted object during the iteration.

Optimization Opportunity

However, reduce() can be slightly slower than Object.fromEntries() in benchmarks, since it requires an extra function invocation per iteration.

We can optimize the reduce callback to avoid this: 

const sorted = Object.entries(data)
  .sort((a, b) => a[1] - b[1]) 
  .reduce((acc, [key, value]) => ({ ...acc, [key]: value }), {});

By returning an object directly instead of invoking a callback, this optimized approach achieves performance closer to fromEntries().

So reduce gives us another good sorting option, as long as you avoid extraneous function calls internally for best efficiency.

Advanced Comparator Functions

The comparator function we provide to Array.sort() determines exactly how the sorting occurs.

Here‘s its signature:

function comparator(a, b) {
  // ...
  return -1, 0, or 1; 
}

By returning -1, 1, or 0 based on comparing a and b, we can produce any type of advanced object sorting logic.

Sort by Multiple Criteria

For example, to sort by multiple criteria descending:

data.sort((a, b) => {

  if (a.value > b.value) return -1;

  if (a.value < b.value) return 1;

  // Values equal, sort by key
  if (a.key < b.key) return -1;

  return 1;

});

This first compares the main sorting value. But if those values are equal, it falls back to a secondary alphabetical sort by key.

Chaining comparator conditions allows multi-level sorting working from most important criteria to least.

Locale-Aware Sorting Strings

When sorting string values, you may want locale-specific ordering:

// German sort places ö after z  
[‘fön‘, ‘föbel‘, ‘zoom‘].sort(...); 

// ["föbel", "fön", "zoom"]

The .sort() method actually supports this via locales:

items.sort((a, b) => 
  a.localeCompare(b, ‘de-u-co-phonebk‘));

Passing the German phonebook collation option properly sorts those strings for Germany/Austria.

This handles sorting strings correctly for any language and region.

Sort by Calculated Values

You can even sort by values computed in the comparator: 

items.sort((a, b) => {

  const aValue = getValueForItem(a);
  const bValue = getValueForItem(b);  

  return aValue - bValue;

});

This allows flexibility to sort by any programmatically determined values per item.

Case-Insensitive Sorting

To sort strings case-insensitively: 

items.sort((a, b) => 
  a.toLowerCase().localeCompare(b.toLowerCase()));

So comparator functions give you a lot of power to customize object sorting beyond basic value comparisons.

Sorting Objects of Objects

A common need is sorting objects where the values are other objects instead of primitives.

Given this data structure:

const data = {
  first: {
    name: ‘John‘,
    age: 30, 
  },
  second: {
    name: ‘Bill‘,
    age: 25
  }
};

We can sort by a property within those inner objects:

Object.entries(data)
  .sort((a, b) => a[1].age - b[1].age);

// Sorts by inner ‘age‘ property

The comparator accesses that nested value directly on the object references.

This works great for JSON data returned from APIs:

fetch(‘/users‘)
  .then(data => {

    // Sort API response objects 
    return data.sort((a, b) => a.age - b.age);

  });

You have full access to nested object properties when sorting.

Performance Optimizations

Now that we‘ve covered several sorting techniques, let‘s analyze the performance differences so we can optimize object sorting.

Benchmark Performance

First, a benchmark testing sorting an object of 1000 elements by value:

Object Sorting Benchmark

(jsBenchmarks – Lower is Faster)

We can observe a few key insights about performance:

  • Object.fromEntries() is consistently the fastest approach
  • Array.reduce() is comparable but slightly slower
  • Very large datasets affect reduce() more significantly

So while reduce() gives the most flexibility, fromEntries() best optimizes raw object sorting speed.

Big O Complexity

The runtime of these algorithms can be analyzed in Big O notation as well:

  • Object.entries() and Object.fromEntries(): O(N) linear time since they directly convert entries
  • Array.sort(): O(N log N) – sorting algorithms use divide & conquer approaches
  • Array.reduce(): O(N) linear time over sorted input

So fromEntries() and reduce() have the best time complexity. But actual run time depends on JavaScript engine optimizations.

Optimization Tips

Here are some tips to optimize object sorting performance:

  • Use Object.fromEntries() instead of Array.reduce() where possible
  • Try to minimize nested function calls in comparator logic
  • If sorting large data, consider workers for parallel execution
  • Cache sort results if repeatedly sorting same object graph

Applying these best practices will keep your object sorting fast even with large datasets.

Conclusion

I hope this guide has given you a comprehensive understanding of efficiently sorting JavaScript objects by their values.

We covered:

  • Several methods: Object.entries() + Array.sort(), Object.fromEntries(), and Array.reduce()
  • Powerful comparator functions for advanced sorting
  • Optimizing performance Big O complexity for large data
  • Real-world examples and use cases

Sorting objects unlocks the ability to display, process, and analyze data in new ways.

These methods give you a toolbox to implement object sorting in your own apps for organizing data more meaningfully.

Let me know if you have any other questions!

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *